Saturday, July 29, 2006

 

Watch out for Iran...

Strategy

Iran Hangs in Suspense As the Conflict Plays Out

Published: July 30, 2006

TEHRAN, July 29 — These should be heady days for Iran’s leaders. Hezbollah, widely regarded as its proxy force in Lebanon, continues to rain down rockets on Israel despite 17 days of punishing airstrikes. Hezbollah’s leader is a hero of the Arab world, and Iran is basking in the reflected glory.

Yet this capital is unusually tense, even jumpy. Officials, former officials and even analysts say that it is too dangerous even to discuss the crisis. In newspapers, even the slightest questioning of support for Hezbollah has been attacked as unpatriotic, pro-Zionist and anti-Islamic.

As the war in Lebanon grinds on, Iranian officials cannot seem to decide whether Iran will emerge stronger — or unexpectedly weakened.

They are increasingly confident of an ideological triumph. But they also believe the war itself has already harmed Hezbollah’s strength as a military deterrent for Iran on the Israeli border.

And foreign policy experts and former government officials said that Iran had come to view Israel’s attack on Lebanon as a proxy offensive. They now view the conflict in Lebanon as the new front line in the decades-old conflict with Washington.

“They are worried that what’s happened in Lebanon to Hezbollah is the United States’ revenge against Iran,” said Hamidreza Jalaipour, a sociologist and former government official. “The way they are attacking them and fighting against them is like waging a war against Iran.”

Iran’s relationship to Hezbollah is both strategic and ideological. The Islamic Revolution in 1979 was viewed by its clerical leaders as a part of a pan-Muslim movement. Linking up with the Shiite Muslims of southern Lebanon was part of Iran’s efforts to spread its ideological influence. But in building up Hezbollah, the ideological motivation fused with a practical desire to put a force on Israel’s northern border.

No matter how this conflict is resolved, Iranian officials already see their strategic military strength diminished, said the policy experts, former officials and one official with close ties to the highest levels of government. Even if a cease-fire takes hold, and Hezbollah retains some military capability, a Lebanese public eager for peace may act as a serious check.

In the past, Iranian officials believed that Israel might pause before attacking Iran because they would assume Hezbollah would assault the northern border. If Hezbollah emerges weaker, or restrained militarily because of domestic politics, Iran feels more it may be more vulnerable.

“This was God’s gift to Israel,” said Nasser Hadian, a political science professor at Tehran University and an expert in Iranian foreign policy. “Hezbollah gave them the golden opportunity to attack.”

He said that Iran does not have the military capability at home to fight an aggressive offensive war against Israel from so far away. He said its only offensive tool would be a missile, which he said would be of limited effect and accuracy.

“If Israel attacked us tomorrow, what are we going to do?” he said.

Analysts and former government officials said Iran has focused on trying to preserve Hezbollah’s influence and deterrence capability. They said Iran has counseled Hezbollah not to show its full military capability to preserve Israeli uncertainty. That may prove difficult for Hezbollah to agree to, given that it is in the midst of a war, and may lead to a divergence of agendas, analysts and former government officials said.

Iran has also worked hard to convince the Lebanese, and Muslims around the world, that Hezbollah is not to blame for the destruction in Lebanon and that it is a legitimate resistance force. That is viewed here as essential to preserve Hezbollah’s influence in Lebanon after the war, and with it Iran’s in the region.

Even as Iranian officials fret about the potential risks, they are savoring the ideological boost. If Hezbollah emerges as the primary political force in Lebanon, Arab governments, which have not pressed hard for a cease-fire, may find that in order to deal with Hezbollah they will have to work through Iran.

One foreign policy expert who is a sometime consultant to the government said that if Hezbollah continued to lob missiles into Israel for another six months to a year, the resulting turmoil in the region could make Iran a power to reckon with in Lebanon as it is in Iraq.

The expert, a professor of international relations at a university in Tehran who is an occasional consultant to the foreign ministry, spoke on the condition he not be identified because he was afraid of retribution.

On the domestic front, the war has promoted officials here to begin to assess how the outcome might require that they retool policies and strategies involving everything from the nuclear issue to diplomatic relations with Arab countries.

Power in Iran is not concentrated in any one hand, not even that of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, but is spread out among many levels. Major decisions, like the nuclear policy, are often the result of consultation and compromise among many forces among Iran’s clerical and political elite.

Confidence in Iran’s ideological gains since the war broke out has buoyed Iran’s hard-liners, and has influenced an internal debate that has been running since the revolution, over whether Iran should focus on domestic economic and political development or on its role as a pan-Islamic leader hoping to spread its revolutionary ideas, political analysts here said.

Even before the war, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was trying to position Iran as the leader of the pan-Muslim world, to unite all Muslims, whether Arabs or Indonesians or Indians, behind the leadership of Tehran. The analysts said that Mr. Ahmadinejad, who was elected on a populist economic message, is the most ideologically driven of Iran’s presidents since the revolution.

“Iran is now playing to its strength,” said a foreign policy expert affiliated with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, who like many people here said he was afraid to be identified for fear of retribution.

Iran is the only nation in the Muslim world controlled by members of the Shiite sect of Islam, and its push to be a regional leader had raised concerns among the area’s Sunni Muslims.

Iran has used the war in Lebanon to try to prove that talk of a Shiite threat is a fiction created by Arab leaders and Americans seeking to maintain power in the hands of American friends in Cairo, Amman and Riyadh.

It has pointed to Israel’s destruction of Lebanon’s infrastructure to promote the idea that this war is not against Hezbollah but against all Muslims. And Iran’s leaders have sought to burnish their own image, at the expense of their Sunni rivals.

“It is inconceivable for anyone who calls himself a Muslim and who heads an Islamic state to maintain relations under the table with the regime that occupied Jerusalem,” said President Ahmadinejad in an interview on Iranian television this week, in a clear dig against governments such as Egypt. “He cannot take pleasure in the killing of Muslims yet present himself as a Muslim. This is inconceivable, and must be exposed. Allah willing, it will.”

President Ahmadinejad posed an even more direct challenge in comments broadcast last week on Iranian television: “A bunch of people with no honor rule some countries in the region. People are being killed before their eyes, while they play games, giving compliments to one another. They think they can let time go by until this issue is forgotten, and then return to the scene. No, they are mistaken.”

The moment Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers, the United States and Israel complained that Iran and its ally, Syria, played a role in sparking the crisis.

Both have denied any advance knowledge of Hezbollah’s July 12 raid. It is hard to know here if analysts and former officials say they accept that notion because they believe it — or because they are afraid to contradict the government.

Only one influential person, Muhammad Atrianfar, publisher of the newspaper Shargh, said in an interview that Hezbollah would never stage such a significant operation without at least notifying Tehran first.

“Officially, Iran is not aware of what Hezbollah does,” he said. “Logically and unofficially Iran is always aware. The reason is clear, because of all that Iran has done for Hezbollah. Hezbollah is Iran in Lebanon. When Iran looks at Hezbollah, it sees Iran.”

In fact, the accepted wisdom here is that the Israeli assault was pre-planned, and that the capture of the two soldiers was simply its excuse. Further, people here believe that the true target was Tehran, and that Israel, the United States and Arab governments in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan are hoping to roll back Iran’s influence in the region.

“They want to cut one of Iran’s arms,” said the Iranian official with close personal ties to the highest levels of government.

“Israel and the U.S. knew that as long as Hamas and Hezbollah were there, confronting Iran would be costly,” said Mohsen Rezai, former head of the Revolutionary Guards, said in an interview with the Baztab website. “So, to deal with Iran, they first want to eliminate forces close to Iran that are in Lebanon and Palestine.”

Nazila Fathi contributed reporting for this article.


Friday, July 28, 2006

 

OK, WORSE than Afghanistan II...

July 27, 2006

As Rumors Swirl, Somalia Seems Set for Full-Scale War

BAIDOA, SOMALIA, July 27 — In the past few days, phantom troops have reportedly flooded across the border from Ethiopia. Mysterious planes have landed in Mogadishu. Young gunmen in a kaleidoscope of camouflage are cruising the streets all over this country, their true allegiance one big question mark.

But in this land of secrets, one thing is clear: the two powers to reckon with in Somalia — the Islamic clerics who rule Mogadishu and the internationally-recognized transitional government confined to Baidoa — are headed on a collision course toward a full-scale war. And this time the crisis may spill far beyond Somalia’s borders.

Ethiopia and Eritrea, bitter enemies, are apparently already arming the two different sides and threatening to ignite ethnic and religious tensions across the Horn of Africa. Many people fear that if a major war breaks out in Somalia, Muslim tribes in Ethiopia’s deserts will rise up and challenge the Christian leadership; Islamists in Mogadishu will storm down the coast toward Kenya; Ethiopia and Eritrea will resume their costly battles; and countries like Sudan and Egypt, which have weighed in before, will weigh in again.

In anticipation of all this, Somalia’s transitional leaders are urging the United Nations to lift an arms embargo. They want more weapons to flow into a place already a free-for-all for armed groups, where an entire generation of young men has grown up with guns in their hands, not pencils.

Islamists in Mogadishu are calling for a holy war as they sweep across a victimized landscape desperate for order, gobbling up territory, absorbing militias and ultimately headed, many people fear, for Baidoa, the midsized town 150 miles away where the fledging transitional government is trying to take root.

The Baidoa government is rushing to fortify its buildings and unify its militias into a national army. But its leaders admit they are outgunned. And a little paranoid. And divided.

The Parliament meets in an old grain warehouse where politicians from different clans struggle to find consensus even with a common enemy, the Islamists, breathing down their necks.

In downtown Baidoa, donkeys snack on piles of garbage, children chant the Koran in bullet-pocked rooms that pass for schools and many people’s foreheads wrinkle up when they asked about their future.

The tensions spiked last week when hundreds of Ethiopian troops allegedly rushed into Baidoa to protect the transitional government. On Wednesday, a mysterious cargo jet landed in Mogadishu, and today there were reports of two more. The Baidoa government immediately accused Eritrea of shipping weapons to the Islamists, which the Eritrean government promptly denied.

United Nations diplomats are shuttling between Baidoa and Mogadishu, urging both sides to negotiate. Meanwhile, United Nations agencies are preparing for massive displacements of people that could result from a major conflict. The Baidoa government will return next week to the Sudan for another round of peace talks with the Islamists, hoping to strike an accord with moderate clerics but fearing it is the hardliners who hold the real power.

“It’s not our policy to fight,” said Ali Mohamed Gedi, the transitional government’s prime minister. “But the Islamists are expanding their muscles. It’s a very fragile time.”

In Mogadishu, the ruined capital, residents are stockpiling batteries, bottled water and other staples. At a rally this past week, thousands packed into a soccer stadium and chanted, “Death to Ethiopia.”

It’s a tale of two cities with no poetic ending in sight. Many people fear war in inevitable. The Islamic Courts Union, a grassroots uprising centered on strict Muslim law, is bent on creating an Islamic state, incompatible with the type of secular government the Baidoa politicians are trying to form. American officials claim some of the Islamist leaders are connected to Al Qaeda, and Washington tried to undermine the Islamists by supporting their warlord rivals, which only backfired.

The Islamists now control Somalia’s biggest city and have access to the country’s best ports and airfields and apparently a pipeline of weapons. But the Islamists can’t dismiss the Baidoa government, because it is recognized by western powers and backed up by Ethiopian muscle.

“Each side has a dream to get rid of the other,” explained Omar Faruk, a Somali journalist. “They’ll never share power.”

The truth about Somalia is that despite all the surface tensions between secularists and Islamists, it is clan allegiances that truly divide society. It’s been that way for centuries since clan-based tribes roamed the deserts and competed for grazing land. One reason why the Baidoa government is weak is because it was organized as a compromise between clans and is therefore riven by rivalries and mistrust. The political culture in Somalia has yet to catch up with the good intentions of the international experts who are trying to facilitate peace.

The Islamic Courts Union, on the other hand, is dominated by one clan, the Hawiye, and two of its larger sub-clans, the Haber-Gider and the Abgal. It is further united under the banner of Islam, though there was, at least initially, a leadership duel between the moderates and hardliners. That duel ended after word began to spread that Ethiopian troops were pouring into Baidoa and the masses rallied behind the most militant clerics.

Many people in Somalia, which is almost purely Muslim, view Ethiopia, a country with a deeply-rooted Christian identity, as a mortal threat. The two nations have feuded for centuries, most recently fighting a war in the late 1970’s.

“That was about the stupidest thing the president could do, inviting our archenemy onto our soil,” said Ahmed Mohammed Suleiman, a member of the transitional Parliament.

More than a dozen Baidoa politicians, including cabinet members, resigned in protest today, creating even more havoc. Some even defected to the Islamists, bringing with them their militia.

The chief of staff for the Baidoa government, Abdirizak Adam Hassan, said no one in Baidoa asked for Ethiopian troops and that Ethiopia had a long history of unilaterally crossing the 1,000-mile-long border to quash militant Islamists in Somalia.

“The reality is our government is weak,” Mr. Hassan said. “We can’t control our borders or our skies.”

United Nations officials provided detailed accounts of a middle-of-the-night arrival of hundreds of shock troops from Ethiopia, down to their polished boots. But the Ethiopian government denied any incursion, and during a three-day visit to Baidoa, this reporter did not see any identifiable Ethiopian soldiers, though his travel was restricted.

Ethiopian officials have said their forces would defend Baidoa if the Islamists attacked, and last week the Islamists came close. One theory now circulating is that this whole episode was a masterful chess move by the Islamists. They steamed up the road from Mogadishu in a convoy of battered pickup trucks with mounted machine guns and came within 25 miles of Baidoa, never intending to attack, the theory goes, but only to provoke an Ethiopian response, knowing full well the hysteria it would fuel.

United Nations officials have accused Eritrea of funneling arms to the Islamists as a way to antagonize Ethiopia. The two countries, once very close, recently fought a border war that cost tens of thousands of lives. Several Arab countries are also suspected of financing the Islamists.

Somalis find all this dizzying. They are used to their own clans fighting each other. Now they have to fathom their country getting torn apart by outsiders.

Hawa Eybeled, a Baidoa resident and businesswoman, who had 15 children but lost 8 to war and disease, is frightened about what lies ahead.

“What is it they say? When the elephants fight, the grass gets trampled.”


 

Afghanistan: the sequel

YEAH, BUSH SURE IS RIGHT! THE WORLD IS SAFER UNDER HIS WATCH!

Senior Official Is Killed in Somalia


Published: July 28, 2006

NAIROBI, Kenya, July 28 — One of the top ministers of the transitional government of Somalia was assassinated outside a mosque today, the latest sign of worsening turbulence in an already unstable country.

Abdallah Deerow Isaq, the minister overseeing the efforts to rewrite Somali’s constitution, was ambushed by a lone gunman as he was leaving Friday prayers at a mosque in central Baidoa, the provincial town serving as the country’s temporary capital, witnesses said.

His death comes at a difficult time for the fledgling government, which is struggling with a powerful Islamic foe in Mogadishu, the country’s principal city, and with internal dissension in Baidoa.

More than a dozen members of the transitional parliament have quit in the past few days, with some of them defecting to Mogadishu to join the Muslim clerics who rule that city.

The parliament has scheduled a vote of confidence for Saturday to depose the Prime Minister, Ali Mohamed Gedi.

Many politicians have said they were fed up with Mr. Gedi, especially after word began to spread last week that large numbers of Ethiopian troops had been called in to the country to protect the Baidoa government. Ethiopia and Somali are regional rivals, and many Somalis said it was treacherous to ask for Ethiopian help.

“If those troops don’t leave soon, our government will fall, one hundred percent,” said Ahmed Mohammed Suleiman, a member of the transitional parliament.

Meanwhile, the Islamic Courts Union, the federation that controls Mogadishu and large swaths of the surrounding countryside, is apparently drawing in armament from neighboring countries. Several mysterious cargo planes that have landed in Mogadishu in recent days are thought to have been carrying heavy weapons.

There is still some hope for peace, though, with talks between the Baidoa transitional government and the Islamists set for next week. But many Somalis fear that another big civil war is coming, and that the Baidoa government and the Islamists will never agree on a formula for sharing power.

Somalia has not had an effective central government since early 1991, when warlords from various clans in the country overthrew its dictator, Mohamed Siad Barre, and then turned on one another. An American military incursion in 1993, meant to halt the civil war and deliver humanitarian aid, ended in failure.

The new interim government, formed with United Nations support, has not been able even to enter the former capital, Mogadishu, which was seized by the Islamist federation in June after months of bitter fighting against clan warlords.


 

Go Saeb, go Saeb, it's your birthday...

Aired July 25, 2006 - 17:00 ET (CNN's Situation Room)


BLITZER: And joining us now is the chief Palestinian negotiator, Saeb Erakat.

Mr. Erakat, thanks very much for coming in.

You were among the Palestinian delegation today that met with the secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice. Was anything accomplished there?

SAEB ERAKAT, CHIEF PALESTINIAN NEGOTIATOR: You know, the mere fact that Dr. Rice came to Ramallah is significant by itself. We -- you know and I know she's in the region because of the war in Lebanon and Israel. But the fact that she came to Ramallah, to tell President Abbas, we haven't forgotten you.

We have been witnessing in Gaza a forgotten zone. You know, six Palestinians were killed yesterday. The day before that, 16. And nobody notices.

And the fact that Dr. Rice decided to come to Ramallah today, and to say what she said to Abu Mazen about the core of the problem, trying to fight for President Bush's vision a two-state solution, was something by itself.

BLITZER: It's exactly today one month since that Israeli corporal, Gilad Shalit, was kidnapped across the Gaza border. Is he likely to be returned to Israel any time soon?

ERAKAT: We hope so. Abu Mazen told the secretary today that he, the Egyptians and the government are exerting maximum effort, first in order to ensure his safety, and in order to get him back to his family.

And he reminded the secretary that we have 10,000 of our own kids in Israeli jails. Some have spent more than 30 years.

He did not specify exactly, but he noted some progress. But he did not -- he didn't want to specify exactly where we're going from here.

BLITZER: Let me read to you what the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations. Dan Gillerman, said yesterday. He said, "Iran and Syria are part of the world's most ominous access of terror and together with Hamas they support and harbor and finance, they actually are today one of the greatest threats towards stability and to engage them would be a horrible mistake."

Do you agree with that assessment?

ERAKAT: Look, I just want to say very frankly, in 1982, Israel went to war against Lebanon. Out of the labor pain, Hezbollah was born. In 1987, we had an Intifada, the Palestinians, and the Israeli army was trying to crush the Palestinian people. And out of these labor pains, Hamas was born.

Wolf, the question that I address to myself, and to Mr. Gillerman, and to all of those who may think will it be after, what will 2006 labor pains produce?

You know, when you have political solutions, you may call upon it as much as you want. Nations follow their interests, parties follow their interests. But you don't solve political problems with a military solution. You don't.

You don't add to the complexities. We know that at the end of the day as Palestinians we're separate from Lebanon. Not that we're not Arabs, that we don't feel sorry for what's going on in Lebanon, but, you know, Lebanon is their own country.

War, no war, tomorrow stabilization force, who will join, who will not join, these are issues that are being discussed the (INAUDIBLE), but we're under occupation.

So, as Palestinians, we're trying our best today to reach a full cessation of violence with Israel. All parties, including Hamas -- and that's what Abu Mazen, my president, is exerting maximum efforts now with all Palestinian parties to deliver a full cessation of violence between us and the Israelis. And I hope he can succeed.

BLITZER: Is there an alliance between Hamas and Hezbollah that runs through Syria and Iran?

ERAKAT: I don't think so. And unless -- I cannot tell you that I know or don't know.

BLITZER: Because the Israelis say that the Iranians, the Syrians, they provide funding to Hamas, and clearly they provide funding and material to Hezbollah.

ERAKAT: Well, look, I know the variables of interaction in this region. I know the complexities facing some Arab countries and the United States from Iran's nuclear program. I know what's going on in Syria. And I know what's going on in Saudi Arabia, in Egypt, in Jordan.

Obviously, for me, as a Palestinian, Wolf, all I'm saying, not in my name. You know, bin Laden fights a war in Afghanistan against the Soviets for 20 years, we are not mentioned. All of a sudden, he's not on good terms with those who financed him and built him. Then Palestine became his issue.

Somebody put a bomb in Bali. And then you hear the term "Palestine." Somebody put a bomb in Morocco, and -- all I want as a Palestinian, OK, I know that if you want to speak about a new Middle East, two elements are needed.

One is peace between Palestinians and Israelis. And you don't need to reinvent the wheel here. It's going to be Israel, next to the state of Palestine on the '67 border. That's as we know it, and that's the vision of President Bush, so that's number one.

Number two is democracy in the Arab world. And anybody who says Arabs are not really for democracy is a racist, Wolf. A combination of peace and democracy should be the main foundations for the new Middle East.

And without these things, I believe we're just going to see the labor pains that give birth to these extremist movements and others and others and others and others. Because, you know, out of this outcome of violence, extremists are gaining. That's the truth. Extremists are gaining.

It's moderates like me who are being undermined. It's the prospect for peace between me and the Israelis that's being undermined now.

BLITZER: All right.

ERAKAT: And that's the truth. That's the unfortunate truth.

BLITZER: We unfortunately have to leave it right there. But Saeb Erakat, it was nice of you to come into Jerusalem. Appreciate it very much.

ERAKAT: Thank you, Wolf.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?