Monday, October 09, 2006
KIM JONG-IL, YOU REALLy, REALLY SUCK
N. Korea Reports 1st Nuclear Arms Test
South Koreans watched a television showing the North’s leader, Kim Jong-il, at a railway station in Seoul this morning.
WASHINGTON, Monday, Oct. 9 — North Korea said Sunday night that it had set off its first nuclear test, becoming the eighth country in history, and arguably the most unstable and most dangerous, to proclaim that it has joined the club of nuclear weapons states.
The test came just two days after the country was warned by the United Nations Security Council that the action could lead to severe consequences.
American officials cautioned that they had not yet received any confirmation that the test had occurred. The United States Geological Survey said it had detected a tremor of 4.2 magnitude on the Korean Peninsula.
China called the test a “flagrant and brazen” violation of international opinion and said it “firmly opposes” North Korea’s conduct.
Senior Bush administration officials said that they had little reason to doubt the announcement, and warned that the test would usher in a new era of confrontation with the isolated and unpredictable country run by President Kim Jong-il.
Early Monday morning, even before the test was confirmed, Bush administration officials were holding conference calls to discuss ways to further cut off a country that is already subject to sanctions, and hard-liners said the moment had arrived for neighboring countries, especially China and Russia, to cut off the trade and oil supplies that have been Mr. Kim’s lifeline.
In South Korea, the country that fought a bloody war with the North for three years and has lived with an uneasy truce and failed efforts at reconciliation for more than half a century, officials said they believed that an explosion occurred around 10:36 p.m. New York time — 11:36 a.m. Monday in Korea.
They identified the source of the explosion as North Hamgyong Province, roughly the area where American spy satellites have been focused for several years on a variety of suspected underground test sites.
That was less than an hour after North Korean officials had called their counterparts in China and warned them that a test was just minutes away. The Chinese, who have been North Korea’s main ally for 60 years but have grown increasingly frustrated by the its defiance of Beijing, sent an emergency alert to Washington through the United States Embassy in Beijing. Within minutes, President Bush was notified, shortly after 10 p.m., by his national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, that a test was imminent.
North Korea’s decision to conduct the test demonstrated what the world has suspected for years: the country has joined India, Pakistan and Israel as one of the world’s “undeclared” nuclear powers. India and Pakistan conducted tests in 1998; Israel has never acknowledged conducting a test or possessing a weapon. But by actually setting off a weapon, if that is proven, the North has chosen to end years of carefully crafted and diplomatically useful ambiguity about its abilities.
The North’s decision to set off a nuclear device could profoundly change the politics of Asia.
The test occurred only a week after Japan installed a new, more nationalistic prime minister, Shinzo Abe, and just as the country was renewing a debate about whether its ban on possessing nuclear weapons — deeply felt in a country that saw two of its cities incinerated in 1945 — still makes strategic sense.
And it shook the peninsula just as Mr. Abe was arriving in South Korea for the first time as prime minister, in an effort to repair a badly strained relationship, having just visited with Chinese leaders in Beijing. It places his untested administration in the midst of one of the region’s biggest security crises in years, and one whose outcome will be watched closely in Iran and other states suspected of attempting to follow the path that North Korea has taken.
Now, Tokyo and Washington are expected to put even more pressure on the South Korean government to terminate its “sunshine policy” of trade, tourism and openings to the North — a policy that has been the source of enormous tension between Seoul and Washington since Mr. Bush took office.
The explosion was the product of nearly four decades of work by North Korea, one of the world’s poorest and most isolated countries. The nation of 23 million people appears constantly fearful that its far richer, more powerful neighbors — and particularly the United States — will try to unseat its leadership. The country’s founder, Kim Il-sung, who died in 1994, emerged from the Korean War determined to equal the power of the United States, and acutely aware that Gen. Douglas MacArthur had requested nuclear weapons to use against his country.
But it took decades to put together the technology, and only in the past few years has the North appeared to have made a political decision to speed forward. “I think they just had their military plan to demonstrate that no one could mess with them, and they weren’t going to be deterred, not even by the Chinese,” a senior American official who deals with the North said late Sunday evening. “In the end, there was just no stopping them.”
But the explosion was also the product of more than two decades of diplomatic failure, spread over at least three presidencies. American spy satellites saw the North building a good-size nuclear reactor in the early 1980’s, and by the early 1990’s the C.I.A. estimated that the country could have one or two nuclear weapons. But a series of diplomatic efforts to “freeze” the nuclear program — including a 1994 accord signed with the Clinton administration — ultimately broke down, amid distrust and recriminations on both sides.
Three years ago, just as President Bush was sending American troops toward Iraq, the North threw out the few remaining weapons inspectors living at their nuclear complex in Yongbyon, and moved 8,000 nuclear fuel rods they had kept under lock and key. Those rods contained enough plutonium, experts said, to produce five or six nuclear weapons, though it is unclear how many the North now stockpiles.
For years, some diplomats assumed that the North was using that ambiguity to trade away its nuclear capability, for recognition, security guarantees, aid and trade with the West. But in the end, the country’s reclusive leader, Kim Jong-il, who inherited the mantle of leadership from his father, still called the “Great Leader,” appears to have concluded that the surest way of getting what he seeks is to demonstrate that he has the capability to strike back if attacked.
Assessing the nature of that ability is difficult. If the test occurred as the North claimed, it is unclear whether it was an actual bomb or a more primitive device. Some experts cautioned that it could try to fake an explosion, setting off conventional explosives; the only way to know for sure will be if American “sniffer” planes, patrolling the North Korean coast, pick up evidence of nuclear byproducts in the air.
Even then, it is not clear that the North could fabricate that bomb into a weapon that could fit atop its missiles, one of the country’s few significant exports.
But the big fear about North Korea, American officials have long said, has less to do with its ability to lash out than it does with its proclivity to proliferate. The country has sold its missiles and other weapons to Iran, Syria and Pakistan; at various moments in the six-party talks that have gone on for the past few years, North Korean representatives have threatened to sell nuclear weapons. But in a statement issued last week, announcing that it intends to set off a test, the country said it would not sell its nuclear products.
The fear of proliferation prompted President Bush to declare in 2003 that the United States would never “tolerate” a nuclear-armed North Korea. He has never defined what he means by “tolerate,” and on Sunday night Tony Snow, Mr. Bush’s press secretary, said that, assuming the report of the test is accurate, the United States would now go to the United Nations to determine “what our next steps should be in response to this very serious step.”
Nuclear testing is often considered a necessary step to proving a weapon’s reliability as well as the most forceful way for a nation to declare its status as a nuclear power.
“Once they do that, it’s serious," said Harold M. Agnew, a former director of the Los Alamos weapons laboratory, which designed most of the nation’s nuclear arms. "Otherwise, the North Koreans are just jerking us around.”
Networks of seismometers that detect faint trembles in the earth and track distant rumbles are the best way to spot an underground nuclear test.
The big challenge is to distinguish the signatures of earthquakes from those of nuclear blasts. Typically, the shock waves from nuclear explosions begin with a sharp spike as earth and rock are compressed violently. The signal then tends to become fuzzier as surface rumblings and shudders and after shocks create seismologic mayhem.
With earthquakes, it is usually the opposite. A gentle jostling suddenly becomes much bigger and more violent.
Most of the world’s seismic networks that look for nuclear blasts are designed to detect explosions as small as one kiloton, or equal to 1,000 tons of high explosives. On instruments for detecting earthquakes, such a blast would measure a magnitude of about 4, like a small tremor.
Philip E. Coyle III, a former head of weapons testing at the Pentagon and former director of nuclear testing for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, a weapons-design center in California, said the North Koreans could learn much from a nuclear test even if it was small by world standards or less than an unqualified success.
“It would not be totally surprising if it was a fizzle and they said it was a success because they learned something,” he said. “We did that sometimes. We had a missile defense test not so long ago that failed, but the Pentagon said it was a success because they learned something, which I agree with. Failures can teach you a lot.”
Sunday, October 08, 2006
Bring on the BICTH-ASS CARDINALS!
METS LOVE IT IN LA-LA LAND
AMAZIN'S SWEEP, ADVANCE TO NLCS
By MARK HALE
October 8, 2006 -- GAME 3 Mets 9 Dodgers 5
LOS ANGELES - Carlos Beltran sprayed Omar Minaya with champagne. Fred Wilpon then poured some on Beltran.
The Mets don't have to stick around California, unless they want to drink more bubbly today, after they swept the Dodgers last night to finish off the NLDS. They knocked off L.A., 9-5 at Dodger Stadium, winning the best-of-five series in three straight and earning their first playoff sweep since the 1969 NLCS over Atlanta.
"Who's the better team in New York?" Jose Valentin asked.
Ask the Yanks.
The Mets are in the NLCS for the seventh time, and will have home field advantage. Game 1 is Wednesday at Shea against either the Cardinals or the Padres. St. Louis leads that series, 2-1, with Game 4 today.
"[Winning last night is] huge," Billy Wagner said, "because now we get a chance to catch our breath and get ready for this next series, whoever we play."
The Yankees, meanwhile, will not be moving on. They lost to the Tigers yesterday, meaning the Mets can't face them in the World Series.
"Too bad for them," Beltran said.
Down 5-4 last night going into the sixth inning after the Dodgers' three-run fifth, the Mets scored three off reliever Jonathan Broxton to retake the lead, then added two more in the eighth.
Shawn Green (three hits, two RBIs) led off the fifth with a deep double to right, and one out later, pinch hitter Michael Tucker worked a walk. Jose Reyes singled up the middle to tie the game, and Paul Lo Duca (two RBIs) followed by dropping a single just over Rafael Furcal's head in shallow left, scoring Tucker to make it 6-5, Mets.
Beltran then popped an RBI single to left to push it to 7-5.
In the eighth, the Mets got two on Lo Duca's RBI single and a run-scoring error by third baseman Wilson Betemit.
"What I'm most proud of is that these guys never looked for reasons why they should lose," Willie Randolph said of his club. "With them, it's always about why we should win."
In the opening frame, the Mets took a 3-0 lead off Greg Maddux, getting RBI singles from David Wright, Cliff Floyd - who later strained his left Achilles' and left the game - and Green. They went up 4-0 in the third on Green's RBI double.
Steve Trachsel pitched three shutout innings to open his first career playoff start. But in the fourth, the Dodgers scored two on James Loney's two-run single. With runners on second and third, Dodgers manager Grady Little pulled Maddux, bringing up Andre Ethier to pinch hit. But stunningly, Randolph hooked Trachsel as well, bringing in Darren Oliver.
Ethier ripped a pitch back to Oliver, but the Mets were fortunate, as Oliver caught the liner for the second out. He then doubled Betemit off third for a double play.
In the fifth, though, Oliver let the Dodgers even it when Jeff Kent (four hits last night in an impressive performance) blasted a two-run game-tying homer. L.A. took the lead later in the inning on a bases-loaded walk off Pedro Feliciano.
The game ended when Shawn Green caught Ramon Martinez's fly ball in the ninth.
"I've got the ball in my pocket," Green said. "If no one else wants it, I'm going to keep it."
After the game, Valentin said that "we're going to dedicate this win to Pedro Martinez and El Duque Hernandez."
Meanwhile, he joined Reyes, Endy Chavez and others singing "Meet the Mets."
Additional reporting by Mike Vaccaro and Brian Costello
Could we please, PLEASE start paying attention to Afghanistan again!!!!?
Afghans may back Taliban, general warns
By FISNIK ABRASHI, Associated Press Writers 9 minutes ago
KABUL, Afghanistan -
Gen. David Richards, a British officer who commands NATO's 32,000 troops here, told The Associated Press that he would like to have about 2,500 additional troops to form a reserve battalion to help speed up reconstruction and development efforts.
He said the south of the country, where NATO troops have fought their most intense battles this year, has been "broadly stabilized," which gives the alliance an opportunity to launch projects there. If it doesn't, he estimates about 70 percent of Afghans could switch their allegiance from NATO to the Taliban.
"They will say, 'We do not want the Taliban but then we would rather have that austere and unpleasant life that that might involve than another five years of fighting,'" Richards said in an interview.
"We have created an opportunity," following the intense fighting that left over 500 militants dead in the southern provinces of Kandahar and Helmand, he said. "If we do not take advantage of this, then you can pour an additional 10,000 troops next year and we would not succeed because we would have lost by then the consent of the people."
NATO extended its security mission last week to all of Afghanistan, taking command of 12,000 U.S. troops in the war-battered country's east. The mission is the biggest ground combat operation in NATO history and gives Richards command of the largest number of U.S. troops under a foreign leader since World War II.
Some 8,000 U.S. troops will continue to function outside NATO, tracking al-Qaida terrorists, helping train Afghan security forces and doing reconstruction work.
Afghanistan is going through its worst bout of violence since the U.S.-led invasion removed the former Taliban regime from power five years ago. The Taliban has made a comeback in the south and east of the country and is seriously threatening Western attempts to stabilize the country after almost three decades of war.
Taliban militants have acknowledged adopting the suicide attacks commonly used by insurgents in " type="hidden"> SEARCH
News | News Photos | Images | Web
There were only two suicide attacks in 2003 and six in 2004, according to Seth Jones, an analyst for the U.S.-based RAND Corp. He said there were 21 in 2005.
Richards, who will lead the NATO forces in Afghanistan until U.S. Gen. Dan K. McNeil takes over in February, said the Taliban may lose support among Afghans if it continues the attacks.